http://fiorenza-a.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] fiorenza-a.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] prosnewsletter 2017-03-09 08:59 am (UTC)


According to the BBC investigation Facebook ignore closed groups swapping pics of 'hot schoolkids' and the related illegal comments, as well as outright child pornography.

But then, as we all know, the real scourge of society is not paedophilia but breastfeeding, so that's okay, then. :0(

Facebook do re-instate breast cancer and breastfeeding pics if challenged, but I'm not happy about them either.

Exporting misogynistic law-making on the sly isn't a great way to emancipate women. There need to be more alternatives so we can vote with our feet.

But I can't deny more writing is a good thing. :0)

I do wonder if I wouldn't get into trouble on PROSFANFIC anyway. I'm happy not to post slash stories - my own take is that all non-canon slash is a type of AU anyway - but I think debate suffers if you can't compare and contrast. It's not that I'd break the rules, it's just that I'd feel a bit stifled in what I could say because I'd be self-censoring in a way I don't feel I have to other places.

On the other hand I get the desire to have a place which isn't swamped by the slash take on Pros. Where there's the space to explore the lads' relationship within a non-sexual framework. A subject to which I'm very drawn, myself.

Conundrums.

See how good the Newsletter is?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting